Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Xeon X5677 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 2268 days newer than Xeon X5677.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5677
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon X5677 - 171 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5677 - 16 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5677
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i7-6900K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5677 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
