Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Xeon X5677 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3698 days newer than Xeon X5677.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 66% better in FIFA 23 than Xeon X5677 - 163 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon X5677 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5677 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5677 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
163
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.73/FPS
100%
Price, £
£118.71
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £118.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5677 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |