Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Xeon X5670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3698 days newer than Xeon X5670.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 70% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon X5670 - 406 vs 239 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5670 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5670 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5670 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |