Key Differences
In short — Xeon X5650 outperforms Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon X5650 is 68 days newer than Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Performs up to 1% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Pentium G6950 - 223 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| Xeon | Collection | Pentium |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Clarkdale |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 73 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
