Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 2892 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon X5650 - 174 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 62 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
174
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.09/FPS
100%
Price, £
£188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 62 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |