Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 2485 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 2% better in Dota 2 than Xeon X5650 - 170 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
