Key Differences
In short — Xeon X5650 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon X5650 is 713 days older than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than FX-6200 - 504 vs 503 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Xeon | Collection | FX |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 3 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
