Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms Xeon X5550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 4369 days newer than Xeon X5550.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 9% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon X5550 - 492 vs 450 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5550 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5550 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Xeon X5550
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5550 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Gainestown | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
