Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3201 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Xeon W3690 - 116 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon W3690
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
| Gulftown | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
