Buy on Amazon
£66.5
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 4018 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 3% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon W3680 - 233 vs 226 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 58 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
233
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.29/FPS
100%
Price, £
£66.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel S1200 PENTIUM Gold G6405 BOX 2x4,1 58W GEN10
Buy for £66.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
