Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 2735 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 44% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon W3680 - 358 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 24 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
