Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 2690 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Xeon W3680 - 118 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
