Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 4153 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Xeon W3565 - 152 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3565 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3565 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
152
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.66/FPS
100%
Price, £
£100.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £100.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14364 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |