Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 4797 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3550
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 130 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 20% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Xeon W3550 - 248 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3550 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3550 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
248
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.44/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1099.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 170 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |