Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 4049 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 44% better in Dead Island 2 than Xeon W3520 - 167 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |