Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 3490 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 17% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon W3520 - 136 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Core i7-9700K
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
