Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 3676 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon W3520 - 169 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 65 vs 130 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
169
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.95/FPS
100%
Price, £
£328.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £328.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |