Buy on Amazon
£49.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2836 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 13% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon W3520 - 79 vs 70 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
79
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.63/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930 Retail - (1151/Dual Core/2.90GHz/2MB/Kabylake/51W/Graphics) - BX80677G3930
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.