Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Xeon w3-2435 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 141 days older than Xeon w3-2435.
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon w3-2435 - 156 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon w3-2435 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w3-2435 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
156
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£239.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £239.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 653 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon w3-2435 | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i5 |
Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |