Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Xeon W-3375 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7640HS is 546 days newer than Xeon W-3375.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3375
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS - 76 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
- Performs up to 14% better in Starfield than Xeon W-3375 - 73 vs 64 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3375 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-3375
Server/Workstation • Jul 29th, 2021
Ryzen 5 7640HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3375 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 29th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ice Lake | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 4189 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
38 | Cores | 6 |
76 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 270 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 43.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
