Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon W-3175X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 158 days newer than Xeon W-3175X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 56 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon W-3175X - 136 vs 132 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 105 vs 255 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 12 |
56 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 255 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
