Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Xeon W-2195 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840HS is 2290 days newer than Xeon W-2195.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2195
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS - 36 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
- Performs up to 7% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon W-2195 - 332 vs 309 FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2195 - 28 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2195 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon W-2195
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W-2195
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Single-Core
1279
51.65589660743134%
Multi-Core
9974
94.36140018921476%
Intel Xeon W-2195 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
18 | Cores | 8 |
36 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
