Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon W-2175 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1481 days newer than Xeon W-2175.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Tanks than Xeon W-2175 - 578 vs 527 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2175 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2175 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
578
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.64/FPS
100%
Price, £
£369.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £369.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 15th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2175 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 15th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 16 |
28 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |