Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2125 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2125 is 813 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2125
- Performs up to 6% better in Minecraft than Athlon 3000G - 697 vs 656 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2125 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2125 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon W | Collection | Athlon |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |