Key Differences
In short — Xeon Gold 6154 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon Gold 6154 is 862 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Gold 6154
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 23 than Athlon 3000G - 205 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 36 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Xeon Gold 6154 - 35 vs 200 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Gold 6154 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Gold 6154 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon Gold | Collection | Athlon |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
200 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |