Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1165G7 outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1165G7 is 3823 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-1165G7 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1165G7
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5645 - 138 vs 113 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Tiger Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1449 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU |
No | Overclockable | No |