Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 3541 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 80 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 19% better in Valorant than Xeon E5645 - 806 vs 676 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 48 vs 12 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
806
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.55/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1250
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 48 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |