Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4663 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 4% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5520 - 259 vs 250 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Single-Core
348
21.709295071740485%
Multi-Core
1454
53.93175074183977%
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
| Gainestown | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
