Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1283 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 44 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 260 vs 255 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76752 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 10 |
44 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |