Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i5-6500T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 481 days newer than Core i5-6500T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-6500T - 157 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500T - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500T
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 35 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Core i5-6500T
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-6500T
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1039
88.42553191489361%
Multi-Core
2843
29.556086911321344%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-6500T |
|---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 4 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
