Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 1918 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600 - 44 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 165 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £286.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
49.557148882328136%
Multi-Core
9619
98.95072523402942%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 6 |
44 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |