Buy on Amazon
£101.2
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $4938
Availability
MSRP in USD: $4938
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1603 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 44 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 204 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
INTEL - CLIENT CPU CORE I5-11400F 2.60GHZ SKTLGA1200 12.00MB CACHE BOXED
Buy for £101.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76603 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 6 |
44 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E5-2699A v4 or Core i5-11400F
Control, 1920 x 1080, High
53 FPS
£16.98/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660
Core i5-11400F
16 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
£899.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
