Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1897 days older than Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 44 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 145 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
