Buy on Amazon
£59.75
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $4938
Availability
MSRP in USD: $4938
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 525 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 9% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G4900 - 228 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 44 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 54 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Intel Celeron G4900 Processor 3.1 GHz 2 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76804 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
52.42553191489362%
Multi-Core
1051
10.926291714315417%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 145 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
