Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 985 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 44 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 148 vs 137 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 105 vs 145 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
69.40342587123449%
Multi-Core
9619
96.79009861139062%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 12 |
44 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
