Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2697 v3 outperforms Core i5-2300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2697 v3 is 1338 days newer than Core i5-2300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i5-2300 - 149 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2300 - 28 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2300
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 95 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2697 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
510
47.39776951672863%
Multi-Core
1490
19.98926750737859%
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-2300 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 145 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
