Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2697 v3 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2697 v3 is 358 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G3900 - 289 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 28 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 51 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2697 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
53.99628252788104%
Multi-Core
992
13.308290850550039%
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
28 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 145 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
