Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2250 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 13% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 385 vs 342 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 105 vs 145 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 32 vs 28 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
385
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.78/FPS
100%
Price, £
£299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 16 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |