Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 3781 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 48% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 136 vs 92 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
136
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£564.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £564.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |