Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 176 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
176
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£224.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £224.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18496 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |