Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2696 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2696 v3 and Xeon E5-2620 v3 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 118 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 36 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell E | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
18 | Cores | 6 |
36 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 85 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |