Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 1627 days newer than Xeon E5-2695 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 120 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 62 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £86.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65826 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
422
32.43658724058417%
Multi-Core
3793
99.16339869281046%
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
115 W | TDP | 62 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |