Buy on Amazon
£188.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2604 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2690 - 169 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 65 vs 135 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Intel® Core™ i7-9700F Processor 12M Cache, up to 4.70 GHz
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66667 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon E5-2690
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2690
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
576
37.18528082633957%
Multi-Core
3366
53.80434782608695%
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.