Buy on Amazon
£195
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7700 is 1764 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2690 - 121 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.61/FPS
100%
Price, £
£195
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-7700 Retail - (1151/Quad Core/3.60GHz/8MB/Kabylake/65W/Graphics) - BX80677I77700
Buy for £195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2690
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
