Buy on Amazon
£101.2
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3297 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dishonored 2 than Xeon E5-2690 - 270 vs 256 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 65 vs 135 Watts
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
INTEL - CLIENT CPU CORE I5-11400F 2.60GHZ SKTLGA1200 12.00MB CACHE BOXED
Buy for £101.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65579 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2690
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2690
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
576
29.372768995410503%
Multi-Core
3366
44.2429022082019%
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E5-2690 or Core i5-11400F
Dishonored 2, 1920 x 1080, Very High
67 FPS
£13.43/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660
Core i5-11400F
16 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
£899.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.