Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1862 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 13% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2690 - 180 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 65 vs 135 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
180
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.23/FPS
100%
Price, £
£220.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £220.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |