Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 66% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 265 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 125 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
265
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.8/FPS
100%
Price, £
£221.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £221.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 14 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |