Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2690 v3 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2690 v3 is 497 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-4350 - 155 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 125 vs 135 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2690 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
