Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2690 v2 outperforms Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2690 v2 is 728 days newer than Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i3-2120T - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2690 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i3-2120T
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-2120T
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
423
72.5557461406518%
Multi-Core
816
19.975520195838435%
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-2120T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
