Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1858 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 6% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 293 vs 277 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 24 vs 20 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |